Skip to main content
Audio Stream

EP00 Dialogue 08 - Brief Therapeutic Interventions - William Glasser, MD, and Paul Watzlawick, PhD


Average Rating:
Not yet rated
Topic Areas:
Psychotherapy |  Dialogues |  Brief Therapy |  Ericksonian Hypnosis and Therapy Techniques |  Ericksonian Psychotherapy |  Family Systems |  Homework |  Reframing |  Resistance |  Strategic Therapy
Categories:
Evolution of Psychotherapy |  Evolution of Psychotherapy 2000 |  Pioneers in Couples and Family Therapy
Faculty:
William Glasser, MD |  Paul Watzlawick, PhD
Duration:
56 Minutes
Format:
Audio Only
Original Program Date:
May 28, 2000
License:
Never Expires.



Description

Description:

Educational Objectives:

  1. Given a topic, to become aware of the differing approaches to psychotherapy, and to identify the strengths and weaknesses in each approach.

*Sessions may be edited for content and to preserve confidentiality*

Outline:

Brief Therapeutic Interventions: William Glasser's Approach

  • Glasser defines brief interventions as “as brief as possible, even if it takes years”

  • Draws from experience in hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities using spontaneous, informal interventions

  • Emphasizes showing care, understanding, and avoiding punitive approaches

  • Describes posing as assistant principal to better understand a student without asserting control

Examples of Brief Interventions

  • Historical examples cited, including Plutarch's tale from Malaysia and a Zen master's creative solution

  • Glasser adds an intervention by mail helping a woman overcome fear of public speaking

  • Shares a case from the Ventura School for Girls where honesty and empathy created change

  • Stresses the impact of saying unexpected, truthful things to shift clients’ behavior and thinking

Paradoxical Interventions and Systemic Approaches

  • Concept of paradoxical interventions introduced—clients asked to amplify their problematic behavior

  • Glasser affirms that truth-telling often provides client relief

  • Discussion of systemic maintenance of problems—symptoms often serve relational or systemic functions

  • Glasser recounts case of a teacher with urinary compulsion possibly tied to job avoidance

Addressing Resistant Clients and Systemic Problems

  • A question is raised about a resistant client who tends to find fault with therapists

  • Suggested strategy: make the problem worse to disrupt resistance

  • Glasser advises turning the client into an ally by acknowledging possible therapist missteps

  • Emphasis on addressing the system, not just the individual

Addiction and Workaholism

  • Discussion of workaholism as a culturally reinforced and employer-valued addiction

  • Uncertainty expressed about addiction solutions, but systemic understanding prioritized

  • Noted challenge of treating addiction in clients who've seen many therapists without change

Brief Interventions with School Officials

  • Suggestions for school-based brief interventions include leveraging teachers students respond to

  • Systemic barriers in schools noted; failures by psychologists can support status quo

  • Glasser emphasizes need for schools to adapt to individual student needs rather than enforcing conformity

Protocol Therapies and Brief Interventions

  • Question raised about tension between protocol-based therapy and intuitive intervention

  • Glasser prioritizes effectiveness over familiarity with protocol models

  • PTSD discussed critically as a potentially system-supported diagnosis with secondary gains

  • Labeling a condition may reinforce and entrench it

Dealing with Compulsive Lying in Adolescents

  • A 14-year-old compulsive liar described; advice given to focus on unmet needs (e.g. lack of friends)

  • Lying framed as a symptom, not the core problem

  • Systemic, holistic understanding stressed over direct confrontation of the behavior

Credits



Faculty

William Glasser, MD's Profile

William Glasser, MD Related Seminars and Products


William Glasser, MD, who received his MD degress in 1953 from Case Western Reserve University was an American psychiatrist. William was awarded an honorary doctorate in human letters by the University of San Francisco. Founder and Director of the Institute for Reality Therapy, he was authoer and editor of ten books on the topics of reality therapy and education. He was also the developer of Choice Theory. His ideas, which focus on personal choice, personal responsibility and personal transformation, are considered controversial by mainstream psychiatrists, who focus instead on classifying psychiatric syndromes as "illnesses", and who often prescribe psychotropic medications to treat mental disorders.


Paul Watzlawick, PhD's Profile

Paul Watzlawick, PhD Related Seminars and Products


Paul Watzlawick, received his Ph.D. from the University of Venice in 1949. He has an Analyst's Diploma from the C.G. Jung Institute for Analytic Psychology in Zurich. Watzlawick has practiced psychotherapy for more than 30 years. He was research associate and principal investigator at the Mental Research Institute. He was Clinical Professor at the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center. Watzlawick is a noted family therapist; he is recipient of the Distinguished Achievement Award from the American Family Therapy Association. Also, he is author, co-author or editor of eight books on the topics of interactional psychotherapy, human communication and constructivist philosophy.

He formulated five axioms. They are:

  1. It is not possible to not communicate. Every behavior is some kind of non-verbal communication.
  2. Every communication has a content. In addition, there is 'metainformation', which says how the communicator wants to be understood.
  3. All partners involved in a communication process also interpret their own behaviour during communication.
  4. Human communication involves both verbal and non-verbal communication. In addition to the spoken words, there are is also a non-spoken part (gestures, behavior, intonation..) which is part of the communication.
  5. Communication between humans is either symmetric or complementary. This is based on whether the relationship of those communicating is based on differences or parity.


Reviews